pyEQL Tutorial: Calculating Osmotic Pressure

pyeql-logo.png

pyEQL is an open-source python library for solution chemistry calculations and ion properties developed by the Kingsbury Lab at Princeton University.

Documentation | How to Install | GitHub

Installation

Uncomment and run the code cell below, if you do not already have pyEQL

[1]:
# pip install pyEQL

First, create a Solution

pyEQL’s built-in property database contains Pitzer model parameters for many simple (binary) electrolytes. If such parameters are available, pyEQL will use them by default.

[2]:
from pyEQL import Solution

# 2 mol/L NaCl
s1 = Solution({"Na+": "2 mol/L", "Cl-": "2 mol/L"})

Get the osmotic pressure

Note that the osmotic pressure (and most Solution properties) are returned as pint Quantity objects (see Converting Units).

[3]:
s1.osmotic_pressure
[3]:
10224795.903885065 Pa

If you want the osmotic pressure in different units, or you only want the magnitude, use to() and magnitude, respectively

[4]:
s1.osmotic_pressure.to("bar")
[4]:
102.24795903885065 bar
[5]:
s1.osmotic_pressure.to("bar").magnitude
[5]:
102.24795903885065

Use a for loop for multiple calculations

You can rapidly get estimates for multiple concentrations (or temperatures, or solutes) by using a for loop. Notice how in the example below, we use f-strings to insert the desired concentration (from the for loop) into the argument passed to Solution and to print the results.

[6]:
for conc in [0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 4]:
    s1 = Solution({"Na+": f"{conc} mol/L", "Cl-": f"{conc} mol/L"})
    print(f"At C={conc:.1f} M, the osmotic pressure is {s1.osmotic_pressure.to('bar'):.2f}.")
At C=0.1 M, the osmotic pressure is 4.63 bar.
At C=0.5 M, the osmotic pressure is 23.07 bar.
At C=1.0 M, the osmotic pressure is 47.40 bar.
At C=2.0 M, the osmotic pressure is 102.25 bar.
At C=4.0 M, the osmotic pressure is 246.95 bar.

Compare different modeling engines

pyEQL contains several different modeling engines that can calculate activity coefficients or osmotic pressures. At present, there are three options:

  1. The native or built-in engine, which includes an implementation of the Piter model (Default).

  2. the phreeqc engine, which utilizes the USGS PHREEQC model with the phreeqc.dat database.

  3. An ideal solution model (ideal) which does not account for solution non-ideality.

You select a modeling engine using the engine keyword argument when you create a Solution. Let’s compare the preditions from the three models.

[7]:
s_ideal = Solution({"Na+": "2 mol/L", "Cl-": "2 mol/L"}, engine="ideal")
s_phreeqc = Solution({"Na+": "2 mol/L", "Cl-": "2 mol/L"}, engine="phreeqc")
s_native = Solution({"Na+": "2 mol/L", "Cl-": "2 mol/L"}, engine="native")
[8]:
s_ideal.osmotic_pressure.to("bar")
[8]:
95.73878553477434 bar
[9]:
s_phreeqc.osmotic_pressure.to("bar")
[9]:
95.73878553477434 bar
[10]:
s_native.osmotic_pressure.to("bar")
[10]:
102.24795903885065 bar

Plot the comparison vs. experiment

We can make a plot showing how the 3 models compare by combining the two previous steps (using a for loop plus changing the engine keyword argument. Note that this example makes use of matplotlib for plotting.

[11]:
# create empty lists to hold the results
pi_ideal = []
pi_phreeqc = []
pi_native = []

concentrations = [0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 1, 1.4, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4]

for conc in concentrations:
    s_ideal = Solution({"Na+": f"{conc} mol/kg", "Cl-": f"{conc} mol/kg"}, engine="ideal")
    s_phreeqc = Solution({"Na+": f"{conc} mol/kg", "Cl-": f"{conc} mol/kg"}, engine="phreeqc")
    s_native = Solution({"Na+": f"{conc} mol/kg", "Cl-": f"{conc} mol/kg"}, engine="native")

    # store the osmotic pressures in the respective lists
    # note that we have to just store the .magnitude because matplotlib can't plot Quantity
    pi_ideal.append(s_ideal.osmotic_pressure.to("bar").magnitude)
    pi_phreeqc.append(s_phreeqc.osmotic_pressure.to("bar").magnitude)
    pi_native.append(s_native.osmotic_pressure.to("bar").magnitude)

We will include experimental data from the IDST as a benchmark. The IDST gives us water activity, which we convert into osmotic pressure according to

\[\Pi = -\frac{RT}{V_{w}} \ln a_{w}\]

Where \(\Pi\) is the osmotic pressure, \(V_{w}\) is the partial molar volume of water (18.2 cm**3/mol), and \(a_{w}\) is the water activity.

[12]:
import math

# water activity at [0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4] mol/kg
water_activity_idst = [
    0.99664,
    0.993353,
    0.99008,
    0.986804,
    0.98352,
    0.966828,
    0.953166,
    0.93191,
    0.913072,
    0.89347,
    0.872859,
    0.85133,
]

# calculate osmotic pressure as -RT/Vw ln(a_w). Factor 10 converts to bar.
pi_idst = [-8.314 * 298.15 / 18.2 * math.log(a) * 10 for a in water_activity_idst]
[13]:
# plot the results!
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt

fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.plot(concentrations, pi_ideal, label="engine='ideal'", ls="--", color="gray")
ax.plot(concentrations, pi_phreeqc, label="engine='phreeqc'", ls=":", color="green")
ax.plot(concentrations, pi_native, label="engine='native'", ls="-", color="navy")
ax.plot(concentrations, pi_idst, label="experiment", ls="", color="red", marker="x")
ax.legend()
ax.set_xlabel("Solute Concentration (M)")
ax.set_ylabel("Osmotic Pressure (bar)")
fig.suptitle("pyEQL prediction of NaCl osmotic pressure")
[13]:
Text(0.5, 0.98, 'pyEQL prediction of NaCl osmotic pressure')
../_images/examples_pyeql_tutorial_osmotic_pressure_21_1.png
[ ]: